FKA Twigs implied that the UK’s ban on her Calvin Klein ad displayed double standards and hinted at racial bias, but the governing body responsible for the decision refutes these allegations.
The UK’s Advertising Standards Authority, with jurisdiction over such matters, informed TMZ that their decision to approve or reject an ad is based solely on their regulations concerning responsibility and offense. FKA’s ad was found to violate these rules due to objectification and inappropriate targeting.
Waiting for your permission to load the Instagram Media.
The controversial image of Twigs reveals her displaying some side-boob and buttocks/thigh while covering the rest with a denim shirt. Although not extremely explicit, comparisons have been drawn to Kendall Jenner‘s similarly risqué CK advertisement that was permitted in the UK.
The ASA asserts that they carefully compared the two “similar but subtly different ads” and identified aspects in Twigs’ ad that differed significantly from Kendall’s, primarily the level of exposure deemed more pronounced in Twigs’ ad.
Upon examining the images, Twigs is observed to display some side-boob and part of her buttocks, whereas Kendall is pictured wearing jeans and maintaining coverage of her chest with her hands.
In addition, the recent steamy CK ad by Jeremy Allen White has prompted discussions on “double standards” following its widespread circulation, indicating a growing dialogue around this issue as highlighted by FKA.
The ASA maintains their stance and acknowledges the complexity of discerning between what may or may not cause offense, emphasizing that it is within their purview to make such decisions.
The ASA clarifies that the ban on FKA’s ad is specific to advertising regulations and not influenced by factors such as race or gender, emphasizing their decision to be confined to advertising standards only.
## FAQ
1. **What was FKA Twigs’ claim about the UK’s ban on her Calvin Klein ad?**
FKA Twigs suggested that the UK’s decision to ban her Calvin Klein ad demonstrated double standards and hinted at racial bias.
2. **What did the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority state in response to FKA Twigs’ claim?**
The UK’s Advertising Standards Authority mentioned that their decision-making process is solely based on their regulations concerning responsibility and offense, and FKA’s ad violated these rules due to objectification and inappropriate targeting.
3. **How does the ASA differentiate FKA Twigs’ ad from Kendall Jenner’s CK ad in terms of exposure?**
The ASA carefully compared the two ads and highlighted the heightened level of exposure in FKA Twigs’ ad, leading to the decision to reject it.
4. **What justification did the ASA provide for their decision regarding FKA Twigs’ ad?**
The ASA emphasized that their decision is based on advertising standards and is not influenced by factors such as race or gender.
## Conclusion
The UK’s Advertising Standards Authority has refuted FKA Twigs’ claim about double standards regarding the ban on her Calvin Klein ad. While the controversy has sparked discussions on social standards and perceptions, the governing body maintains that its decision was made in accordance with advertising regulations and was not influenced by factors such as race or gender.