Products You May Like
Safaree Samuels has recently filed a petition in court, requesting a reduction in his monthly child support payments to Erica Mena. The reality star claims that his financial situation has changed significantly since their divorce settlement in 2022, where he agreed to pay $4,305 monthly for the support of their two children.
In his petition, Safaree details that the original child support amount was determined based on his former income of $61,157 a month and Mena’s income of $41,289 a month. However, he asserts that he is no longer earning at that level. Moreover, Safaree points out that he has been actively spending more time with his children, often exceeding the court-mandated 12 days per month, indicating a shift in his parenting responsibilities.
In addition to outlining his diminished income, Safaree’s filing highlights his reduced role in the reality TV show that previously bolstered his earnings. He was a primary cast member on “Love and Hip Hop Atlanta,” but reports indicate that he is not currently engaged with the show on a full-time basis. Alongside this, he states that his ability to book paid appearances has significantly decreased.
Safaree’s attorney further emphasizes the negative impact of Erica Mena’s online behavior on his ability to secure new work. For the past six months, Mena has allegedly used her social media platforms to disparage Safaree’s character, referring to him as a “deadbeat” and questioning his parenting abilities. This public critique, Safaree argues, has hindered his job prospects by creating a hostile environment where potential collaborators may be discouraged from working with him.
The petition also accuses Mena of meddling in Safaree’s professional relations by allegedly contacting his potential co-stars and production crews to spread false information, further damaging his reputation in the industry.
With Safaree navigating both financial constraints and personal discontent stemming from Mena’s social media activities, the court’s decision on his petition could have considerable implications for both his financial obligations and parental relationship. As discussions in court unfold, one has to wonder how this interplay of personal and professional challenges will shape their co-parenting journey moving forward.
In the aftermath of their split, this legal battle sheds light on the complexities faced by public figures in the realm of co-parenting and financial responsibilities. Only time will tell how both parties will adapt to their changing circumstances.